MegaZone (zonereyrie) wrote,

I know it is wrong...

But I can't help but feel a small bit of glee at this bit of Schadenfreude.

Why? Well, the last couple of times LJ stuck their head up their ass with a bad PR move, all the people doing the "We'll just go somewhere else!" seemed to run to InsaneJournal. And now IJ has proven to be, shall we say, less than stable. Hosting provider issue or not, in the end the site is down and they came close to losing a month of data.

And this is history repeating itself - with past exoduses the bulk of people fled to GreatestJournal. And then GJ imploded under the strain.

I've said it before, and I'll probably say it again, running an infrastructure that can support the kind of load LJ does and making it (relatively) stable is not easy. You can't just download the LJ source, setup a couple of servers, and welcome all comers.

I'd still rather trust my data to LJ than one of the upstart sites trying to run the LJ code. At least LJ seems to be *technically* competent, even if they seem hell-bent on attempting to perfect a recursive rectal-cranial inversion on the PR front.
Tags: bad person, geek, lj

  • My tweets

    Fri, 01:42: Hey @ comcast @ Xfinity, this is the second time in a week that you've killed Internet service just after 1am for 'routine…

  • My tweets

    Wed, 17:53: I haven't shared this in a while - but F5 is hiring for many different roles all around the globe: Many of…

  • My tweets

    Tue, 12:36: RT @ BoingBoing: NASA hid an Easter Egg in the parachute for�Perseverance Tue, 14:15: Hey, @ Google,…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment